CO129-357 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [7-9] — Page 190

137

Botrach. Ratt) gift „Poat bollekIyptonos na naw di card borrtotal

ale to drow wia dohw natiivat vituskočitna noɑtte: Vino sit at

med I bar

►

„Poojdna oris no notaigo na kaonqze bloo oriw drueb

ubuwrazta I es bolthe nag erit qerty sveď binora I be Ivanog

berto't I notakqo era sarta rtwosta eran aðgove aucupsadne bus

$

V

3 half days: the Court sitting on May 10th., 11th,,

12th., 13th., 14th. and 20th.

(111).

An appeal of the Imperial Bank of China lasted

2 days: May 25th. and 26th.

(iv). An appeal by Messrs. David and Company lasted 4

full days, and one-half day: June 28th., 29th.,

30th., July 1st. and 2nd.; and there is to be a

re-argument on one point in a fortnight's time.

20 medrede or det duo datog ouís Jalur I

.98*HODA (SW

5.

With regard to case (11) the fact was over-

and toe te violenag bhluno 358q yo no £Ibw boon no netistbroo

hirow RISA-IA. .Deportive vore .A v12 89 Brodva oʻz no malinow

<

wild of gałwn ti ar punktas: kot no arton birow ba wob tou od

aisa

7

VIS AMOR ,taignals of mudar os galvait labral to onbirt.

Isepja dzen ord LILý toro abament hfuo. tale,bras" od don blưoo

Iwoo monetetans wy 88 rst oe "I tofaree

edzi o8 BAW Walon ad end juffeyo! meris me of gyed blnov 1

Iptotherlong,etaloh wolacoom due malicou brdt,evitostøh yi-

**t mot berImmer swal bfnGo

Jakt eft,benang rand brut mendoa sté II

.A

PO UNŢCOUR

eroterede I botnsg ably Swods his kood eval bluow nodeapa

to scach 0 MA Broo8 cult rot notes:rioteł salwoffot aid brengs

yali zozta J**00 £IT end to Xrow and

Invab d boðaaf yag of n० q1H ed? to Issiqa nA .(1)

**I her to

+

odt datifw at noktakbeburg, Ivala'no al saso A .(t) *paioanne ed roofs.,boð¤oznénk saw *mecurevon

bus,ash £furt & betnel,tun? [Ist adé ozoted

¿

-looked, by myself as well as by everybody else, that sometimes

by agreement between the parties, a case is haard in First

Instance before the Pull Court in order to save the expense of

an intermediate appeal, and to allow the case to go direct to

the Privy Council. The Government availed itself of this provi-

-sion, and this was a case in which the privilege would be

allowed (see Ordinance 3 of 1873, s. 22); it would therefore

have been heard before the new Appeal Court.

Another case was also heard before the Full

Court, which involved a serious charge against a Solicitor.

The hearing lasted 8 days and a half. I have not however

included it in the above statement, as I should probably not

have made the necessary order for hearing before the new Pull

Court.

5.

It therefore appears that the new Court

would have been sitting on 18 working days; without making any

allowance